Music, Healthcare Reform and Why You Need To CareWhen Pete Wentz was 23 years old, his life was not like most of ours. Pete was spending his time traveling around in a van with his friends and bandmates trying to make Fall Out Boy happen. However, Pete did have something in common with an overwhelming number of 23 year olds: he had no health insurance. And according to what he said in a forum on Wednesday night, hosted by Passtheball.com and Rock The Vote, his choices amounted to either pay for health insurance or put gas in the van. Insurance or buy a new amp. Insurance or promotion for the band.
I'm opening with this story as a way of impressing upon you why an article on healthcare reform is appearing on Buzznet.com. I know many of you complain anytime political opinion or debate mixes with music, but please, bear with me here. Because while you generally might not care about politics, teens and young adults are one of the age groups who need to be most concerned with the state of healthcare reform. Why? Because young adults are twice as likely to not have health insurance coverage through their employer. 1/4 of young adults, people between the ages of 18 and 29, report having some kind of medical debt and 1/3 of them have problems paying their medical bills. In fact, that age group is the most likely in the US to be uninsured. And health insurance and health issues do constantly affect the musicians that many of you care about. Pete Wentz broke his foot during a concert after an ill-thought-out leap from a speaker. Gabe Saporta of Cobra Starship and Bill Kaulitz of Tokio Hotel both suffered from vocal cysts which threatened their careers. In early 2007, The Cab crashed their van and were very, very lucky to escape without any major injuries. And of course, let's not discount the fact that even without career related problems, artists still get sick. In fact, Andy "The Butcher" Mrotek, drummer for The Academy Is..., was just recently in the hospital because of flu-like symptoms he developed while on the Alternative Press Fall Ball Tour. More than likely, none of these people have health insurance through their labels. As Rock For Health explains "The artists see no benefits, no health insurance, nothing. Musicians are not seen as employees of a record label. They are 'temps' – temporary employees – because of the record contract that they sign. They sign their career and lives over to these labels, which help develop it and help it grow." Let's not forget that it's not just the bands who make a tour happen. Every tour includes a crew that helps get the show ready, go off without a hitch, and keep the bands fed. And none of those people are given insurance, either. Mark Hoppus, in an open-ed piece for The Huffington Post, relates the story of Ali, a caterer on the recent Blink-182 tour, who was rushed into the ER with appendicitis. While the doctors managed to remove her appendix before it burst, Ali found herself uninsured and faced with bills which total over $42,000. Ali has set up a site to take donations to help her cover the costs and Hoppus himself has pledged to match every donation dollar for dollar until Ali's bills are paid off. But this shouldn't be necessary. There is no reason in a first world nation where someone should be completely uninsured. In fact, the USA is the only first world nation and only democratic nation that does not provide affordable healthcare for all of it's citizens. While the very lowest income bracket has the option of Medicaid, let me assure that is only the lowest income bracket. I know from personal experience how difficult it is to get government assistance, no matter how badly you need it. Right now, this issue is being heavily debated in Congress. Both the House and the Senate are working on drafts of a Healthcare Reform Bill as we speak. Er, type. According to Rock the Vote, the three biggest things they are pushing to see included are:
One of the things Pete kept repeating during the forum on Wednesday night was that young adults needed to be informed of the facts because a lot of the information being provided is misleading. He said that a lot of people are trying to make the situation much more complicated than it really is, and that this is not a partisan issue, it is an issue of human rights. On tour he has seen countries such as Canada and France where everyone does have access to healthcare and it works. In the spirit of Pete's words, here are some quick facts that I feel need to be cleared up:
I have only briefly touched on the issue here. There is not nearly enough space for me to address everything that was even addressed in the hour long forum (which will be archived online by Monday, hopefully. I will provide a link as soon as it is live and suggest you watch!), let alone all the information out there available on the issue. And I urge all of you to seek out information, educate yourself, discuss the situation with friends and family, and decide for yourself. And, if you want to, take action. Rock the Vote has a fantastic site with information on how you can get involved and help work for this reform. And remember, this is a change that will directly impact your generation, both those of you on your own and those of you who won't be in danger of losing your parent's coverage for a few years. It's your lives and your health, protect them.
|
ARCHIVE
December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 MY FRIENDS
Nessi with an I
baronetess WeAreTheVampions bulletproofheeb cubistmanifesto breesays rockinponda PanasonicYouth Buzznet's Official MiseryXchordâ„¢ yashiyama peterismyplaymate Gretchen Weiners FOLLOWERS ALL FRIENDS Newageamazon's Journal Widgets: RSS | ATOM | JavaScript |




Thank you.
We can debate upside and downside over one plan or another, but the idea that "things are fine as they are" when millions of people are turned down or can't afford any plan at all is a DISGUSTING reflection on how we treat "our fellow americans".
There's no excuse.
EXACTLY.
What really boggles my mind is that you can be turned down health insurance for being a victim of domestic violence. It just angers me.
Seems like a simple, obvious idea to you, doesn't it?
If you want a look at some of the worst underbelly of America's classism and racism, go read some of the blogs of americans "explaining" why we shouldn't have government health insurance. The LEAST OFFENSIVE of all the arguments is "I'm a libertarian/anarchist and don't believe in government doing anything other than passing laws and (maybe) having a military". But from there, it quickly devolves into a whole UGLY SLEW of arguments that... when you boil them down to what people are truly saying, are nothing more than "THOSE PEOPLE are less deserving".
(I might not be QUITE so bitter on this issue if so many of those people weren't the same founding fathers worshipers who are so indignant about "right to bear arms" and "judicial activism"... "all men are created equal" my ass.)
If we focused on preventative care and education, I imagine thered be less surgeries and major illnesses. Lord knows if I had dental insurance my entire life I could've saved myself a few root canals.
For all my life, I have been included in my dad's/family's health insurance and only recently, when I picked up a job and earned enough to support myself, I had to start paying for myself. Yet, while still being a student, I pay a lot less than my dad. I could be slightly wrong with this but I think in Germany, it's pretty much a violation of law not to be insured (in fact one of my friends got expelled from university since she couldn't supply a statement that she had health insurance) and if you cannot pay, government will jump in.
My dad had to have a knee replacement last year and had to pay nothing; neither for the surgery nor the treatment afterwards and whatever costs the insurance wouldn't cover, he got financial aid from somewhere else.
My mother had to undergo cancer treatment this year and not once was she asked to pay anything at all.
It's not "the law" in any way to have insurance here, but, like you're friend, there are lots of places you can't go, things you can't do without insurance. School sports, and many recreational sports, for example, all require insurance. Universities and private schools.
It's just, in america, if you can't pay, government doesn't jump in. "If they can't afford it, why should I have to pay for them" the anti-tax americans cry out. Not that THEY can afford private care either, they're just upclass enough that their employer is footing the difference.